6.4.14
State
Jackson County Utility Authority begins process to force sewer hookups in
Ocean Beach Estates
Mississippi Press
April M. Havens
PASCAGOULA, Mississippi -- The Jackson County Utility Authority has sent
out letters to Ocean Beach Estates residents asking them to connect to the
authority's completed sewer system.
http://blog.gulflive.com/mississippi-press-news/2014/06/jackson_county_utility_authori_1.html
Officials plan request for debris removal
WTVA
LOUISVILLE, Miss. (WTVA) -- County and city leaders in areas affected by
the April 28th tornado will discuss their options for private property
debris removal on Wednesday.
http://www.wtva.com/news/local/story/Officials-plan-request-for-debris-removal/OBf4m7qMLkeOIWwMD5TZ8A.cspx
PSC goes on record opposing nuclear waste disposal in Mississippi
Sun Herald
The Mississippi Public Service Commission has become the first state agency
to go on record to oppose storage of the nation's nuclear waste in
Mississippi, Northern District PSC Commissioner Brandon Presley said
Tuesday.
http://www.sunherald.com/2014/06/03/5623050/psc-goes-on-record-opposing-nuclear.html?sp=/99/184/208/
Regional
United States Environmental Services merger could add New Orleans jobs
Jennifer Larino
The Times-Picayune
June 03, 2014 at 5:30 PM
United States Environmental Services, an environmental services company
with New Orleans roots, has merged with a prominent Midwestern service
provider. The new company will employ about 100 in the New Orleans area,
with the potential for more jobs in coming years.
http://www.nola.com/business/index.ssf/2014/06/united_states_environmental_se.html#incart_river
National
New EPA Carbon Rules Pinch States Unevenly
Kentucky Appears to Have It Easier Than Washington State, but It Doesn't
Wall Street Journal
Kentucky appears to have it easy under the Obama administration's new
climate rules unveiled Monday, with an 18.3% cut in carbon-dioxide
emissions required by 2030. Washington state, by contrast, must cut its
emissions by 72%.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/new-epa-carbon-rules-pinch-states-unevenly-1401839554
What's the Real Cost of the EPA's Emissions Cap?
Agency's Estimate Assumes Demand From Power Plants Will Drop
Wall Street Journal
Are the new federal limits on greenhouse-gas emissions going to cost a lot,
as critics say, or a little, as the Environmental Protection Agency
asserts?
That depends on whether you think Americans are going to use more
electricity in coming years or cut way back.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/whats-the-real-cost-of-the-epas-emissions-cap-1401838933
Will Developing World Join EPA Push for Carbon Cuts?
Persuading China, Other Large Emitters to Follow Suit Won't Be Easy
Wall Street Journal
America's push to cut carbon-dioxide emissions is partly intended to spur
other large emitters—especially China—to cut their own emissions more
aggressively to tackle climate change. But will it work?
http://online.wsj.com/articles/will-developing-world-join-epa-push-for-carbon-cuts-1401831224
EPA could change power plant rule significantly
The Hill
By Timothy Cama - 06/03/14 04:52 PM EDT
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) might make major revisions to its
proposal to limit carbon dioxide emissions if states show they cannot meet
the standards.
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/208112-epa-could-change-power-plant-rule-significantly
Press Releases
Wicker: Draconian Climate Regulations Would Burden Miss. Farmers, Foresters
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Roger Wicker, R-Miss., today expressed his
concerns with new Environment Protection Agency (EPA) regulations on carbon
emissions during a Senate Environment and Public Works subcommittee
hearing. The hearing specifically addressed "Farming, Fishing, Forestry,
and Hunting in an Era of Changing Climate."
"Yesterday, as part of the President's Climate Action Plan, EPA
Administrator Gina McCarthy announced a new set of rules to regulate carbon
dioxide emissions from existing power plants," Wicker said. "These
regulations would have little effect on the climate, but the rules would
have a negative effect on the livelihood of all energy users, including the
farmers, foresters, and fishermen who are the focus of today's hearing.
"These industries already face a myriad of challenges in a difficult
economic environment. But at what cost are we going to hurt these economic
sectors in the pursuit of aggressive but dubious climate regulations? The
costs to these industries are assured to go up, but the benefits are not."
EPA's proposed rules have been studied by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce,
which recently released a report analyzing their impact. The group, which
represents businesses and trade organizations, estimated that the
regulations could increase electricity costs by $289 billion by 2030.
"Farmers have been managing their crops effectively and adapting to
variable climate conditions for generations and generations. This is
nothing new. Unfortunately, this generation will have to cope with higher
electricity costs because of questionable climate regulations. For farmers
who properly manage their land, a changing climate is not the problem, but
burdensome regulations that increase the cost of farm production are."
Wicker also noted the many economic benefits and services of America's
forests, which would be adversely affected by the new regulations.
"Forestry in Mississippi is a $14 billion industry and supports more than
63,000 full- and part-time jobs," Wicker said. "Healthy, productive, and
well-managed forests cover more than 60 percent of my home state. These
healthy forests support industry that employs 25 percent of Mississippi's
manufacturing workforce. Given the current depressed market for forestry
goods, higher prices for electricity would only worsen industry problems.
For foresters who properly manage their trees, a changing climate is not
the problem, but onerous regulations that increase the cost of forestry
production are.
"We should be creating jobs and strengthening the economy, not hindering
it," Wicker concluded.
http://www.wicker.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=e176e24c-486e-48ab-81d0-fe48da030116
Wednesday, June 4, 2014
Tuesday, June 3, 2014
News Clippings 6/3/14
6/3/14
State
EPA goal for Mississippi is to cut carbon by 38 percent by 2030
The Associated Press
June 02, 2014 at 6:15 PM
JACKSON, Mississippi -- The federal government is proposing that
Mississippi's carbon dioxide emissions from power plants be 38 percent
lower by year 2030 compared to 2005.
http://blog.gulflive.com/mississippi-press-news/2014/06/epa_goal_for_mississippi_is_to.html#incart_river
Groundworx attorney to council: "We're on a very short fuse."
WDAM
HATTIESBURG, MS (WDAM) -Hattiesburg's wastewater treatment project
continues to move forward even though the city is stalling on financing the
project.
http://www.wdam.com/story/25674986/groundworx-attorney-to-council-were-on-a-very-short-fuse
Groundworx threatens suit over stalled wastewater works
Hattiesburg American
It proved to be an information-laden Monday evening at the City
Council chambers when it came to the city's stalled efforts to
revamp its sewage treatment and wastewater disposal system.
http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/story/news/local/hattiesburg/2014/06/02/hattiesburg-groundworx-kim-bradley-deborah-delgado-henry-naylor/9896161/
Heavy rains and pounding surf turn beaches into a big mess
WLOX
HARRISON COUNTY, MS (WLOX) -You'll be seeing a lot of heavy beach cleaning
equipment in the coming days. Debris and seaweed line the beach in Harrison
County. Chuck Loftis is the Sand Beach Director.
http://www.wlox.com/story/25670051/recent-rains-bring-debris-erosion-to-harrison-county-beaches
Purple Creek Bank Eroding Causing Concerns for Residents
WJTV
JACKSON, Miss. - "It really does concern me because I own my home, I'm old
and I'm not about to move," says Frances Mabry. She says she's desperate to
get the Purple Creek bank behind her home to fixed. She claims it's quickly
eroding and could do some major damaged if it's not stopped.
http://www.wjtv.com/story/25673827/purple-creek-bank-eroding-causing-concerns-for-residents
Regional
Controlled burn planned after oil spill in Delta National Wildlife Refuge
Ken Daley
The Times-Picayune
June 02, 2014 at 8:52 PM
Officials from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Coast Guard
announced Monday they were working to mitigate damage from a spill of crude
oil within the Delta National Wildlife Refuge.
http://www.nola.com/environment/index.ssf/2014/06/authorities_work_to_contain_50.html
Louisiana lawmakers quick to condemn Obama administration plan to reduce
carbon emissions
Bruce Alpert
Times-Picayune
June 02, 2014 at 3:31 PM
WASHINGTON -- Louisiana congressional members Monday quickly condemned the
Obama administrations bold plan to reduce carbon emissions from existing
power plants by 30 percent in 16 years.
http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/06/louisiana_lawmakers_quick_to_c.html#incart_river
Bentley says carbon emissions plan unfair to Southern states
Tuscaloosa News
By Patrick Rupinski
Gov. Robert Bentley said Monday that President Barack Obama's plan to
reduce carbon emissions puts an unfair burden on Southern states.
http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20140602/news/140609953?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
National
EPA proposes cutting carbon dioxide emissions from coal plants 30% by 2030
Washington Post
By Juliet Eilperin and Steven Mufson,
The Environmental Protection Agency proposed a regulation Monday that would
cut carbon dioxide emissions from existing coal plants by up to to 30
percent by 2030 compared with 2005 levels, taking aim at one of the
nation's leading sources of greenhouse gases.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/epa-to-propose-cutting-carbon-dioxide-emissions-from-coal-plants-30percent-by-2030/2014/06/01/f5055d94-e9a8-11e3-9f5c-9075d5508f0a_story.html
Taking Page From Health Care Act, Obama Climate Plan Relies on States
NY Times
By CORAL DAVENPORT and PETER BAKER
JUNE 2, 2014
WASHINGTON — President Obama's new plan to fight climate
change depends heavily on states' devising individual
approaches to meeting goals set in the nation's capital, a
strategy similar to the one he used to expand health care,
often with rocky results.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/03/us/politics/obama-epa-rule-coal-carbon-pollution-power-plants.html?ref=earth&_r=0
Utilities Size Up Emission Cap for Power Plants
Coal Producers Find Relief in Certain Elements of the EPA's Plan
Wall Street Journal
New federal limits on greenhouse-gas emissions would force sweeping changes
in the U.S. electric system but wouldn't deliver the knockout blow to coal
that mining companies and some power producers had feared.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/greenhouse-gas-emissions-limits-likely-to-drive-up-electricity-prices-1401715727
EPA Plan Stokes Posturing in Midterm Elections
GOP Lawmakers Say Proposal Will Kill Jobs; Administration Says it Will
Promote Energy Efficiency
Wall Street Journal
WASHINGTON—President Barack Obama's plan to reduce carbon emissions is
escalating environmental policy fights in energy-rich states, home to many
of the marquee races that could determine which party controls the Senate
after November's elections.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/epa-proposal-draws-fire-from-united-republicans-some-democrats-1401737527
New pollution rule puts onus on states to cut carbon emissions
New pollution rule puts onus on states to reduce carbon emissions
BY CHRIS ADAMS AND LESLEY CLARK
McClatchy Washington BureauJune 2, 2014
WASHINGTON -- A major initiative to cut the pollution emitted from the
nation's power plants set off a scramble Monday in Washington -- where
Republicans instantly pounced on the proposed rules -- and in states, where
much of the work in implementing the rules will be done.
http://www.sunherald.com/2014/06/02/5620410/new-pollution-rule-puts-onus-on.html?sp=/99/102/
Press Releases
Remarks for Administrator McCarthy, Announcement of Clean Power Plan,
Washington, DC
WASHINGTON- About a month ago, I took a trip to the Cleveland Clinic. I met
a lot of great people, but one stood out—even if he needed to stand on a
chair to do it. Parker Frey is 10 years old. He's struggled with severe
asthma all his life. His mom said despite his challenges, Parker's a tough,
active kid—and a stellar hockey player.
But sometimes, she says, the air is too dangerous for him to play outside.
In the United States of America, no parent should ever have that worry.
That's why EPA exists. Our job, directed by our laws, reaffirmed by our
courts, is to protect public health and the environment. Climate change,
fueled by carbon pollution, supercharges risks not just to our health, but
to our communities, our economy, and our way of life. That's why EPA is
delivering on a vital piece of President Obama's Climate Action Plan.
I want to thank Janet McCabe, our Acting Assistant Administrator at the
Office of Air and Radiation, and the entire EPA team who worked so hard to
deliver this proposal. They should be very proud of their work; I know I
am.
Today, EPA is proposing a Clean Power Plan that will cut carbon pollution
from our power sector, by using cleaner energy sources, and cutting energy
waste.
Although we limit pollutants like mercury, sulfur, and arsenic, currently,
there are no limits on carbon pollution from power plants, our nation's
largest source. For the sake of our families' health and our kids' future,
we have a moral obligation to act on climate. When we do, we'll turn
climate risk into business opportunity, we'll spur innovation and
investment, and we'll build a world-leading clean energy economy.
The science is clear. The risks are clear. And the high costs of climate
inaction keep piling up.
Rising temperatures bring more smog, more asthma, and longer allergy
seasons. If your kid doesn't use an inhaler, consider yourself a lucky
parent, because 1 in 10 children in the U.S. suffers from asthma. Carbon
pollution from power plants comes packaged with other dangerous pollutants
like particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide, putting our
families at even more risk.
Climate inaction is costing us more money, in more places, more often. 2012
was the second most expensive year in U.S. history for natural disasters.
Even the largest sectors of our economy buckle under the pressures of a
changing climate, and when they give way, so do businesses that support
them, and local economics that depend on them.
As our seas rise, so do insurance premiums, property taxes, and food
prices. If we do nothing, in our grandkids' lifetimes, temperatures could
rise 10 degrees and seas could rise 4 feet. The S&P recently said climate
change will continue to affect credit risk worldwide.
This is not just about disappearing polar bears or melting ice caps. This
is about protecting our health and our homes. This is about protecting
local economies and jobs.
The time to act is now. That's why President Obama laid out a Climate
Action Plan—to cut carbon pollution, build a more resilient nation, and
lead the world in our global climate fight.
Today's proposed Clean Power Plan is a critical step forward. Before we put
pen to paper, we asked for your advice. Our plan was built on that
advice—from states, cities, businesses, utilities, and thousands of people.
Today kicks off our second phase of crucial engagement.
Shaped by public input, present trends, proven technologies, and common
sense, our Plan aims to cut energy waste and leverage cleaner energy
sources by doing two things: First, setting achievable, enforceable state
goals to cut carbon pollution per megawatt hour of electricity generated.
And second, laying out a national framework that gives states the
flexibility to chart their own, customized path to meet their goals.
All told, in 2030 when states meet their goals, our proposal will result in
30 percent less carbon pollution from the power sector across the U.S. when
compared with 2005 levels. That's like cancelling out annual carbon
pollution from two thirds of all cars and trucks in America. And if you add
up what we'll avoid between now and 2030—it's more than double the carbon
pollution from every power plant in America in 2012.
As a bonus, in 2030 we'll cut pollution that causes smog and soot 25
percent more than if we didn't have this plan in place. The first year that
these standards go into effect, we'll avoid up to 100,000 asthma attacks
and 2,100 heart attacks—and those numbers go up from there.
That means lower medical bills and fewer trips to the emergency room,
especially for those most vulnerable like our children, our elderly, and
our infirmed. This is about environmental justice, too, because lower
income families, and communities of color are hardest hit.
Now let me get into the details of our proposal.
This plan is all about flexibility. That's what makes it ambitious, but
achievable. That's how we can keep our energy affordable and reliable. The
glue that holds this plan together, and the key to making it work, is that
each state's goal is tailored to its own circumstances, and states have the
flexibility to reach their goal in whatever way works best for them.
First, to craft state goals, we looked at where states are today, and we
followed where they're going. Each state is different, so each goal, and
each path, can be different.
Second, the goals spring from smart and sensible opportunities that states
and businesses are taking advantage of right now. From plant to plug.
Let me tell you about the kinds of opportunities I'm talking about:
We know that coal and natural gas play a significant role in a diverse
national energy mix. This Plan does not change that—it recognizes the
opportunity to modernize aging plants, increase efficiency, and lower
pollution. That's part of an all-of-the-above strategy that paves a more
certain path for conventional fuels in a carbon constrained world.
States also have the opportunity to shift their reliance to more efficient,
less polluting plants. Or, instead of low carbon sources, there's always
the opportunity to shift to "no" carbon sources like nuclear, wind, and
solar. Since 2009, wind energy in America has tripled and solar has grown
ten-fold. Our nuclear fleet continues to supply zero carbon baseload power.
Homegrown clean energy is posting record revenues and creating jobs that
can't be shipped overseas.
Those are all opportunities at plants, but what about at the plug? Existing
technologies can squeeze the most out of every electron, helping us use
electricity more efficiently in our homes and businesses. More efficiency
means we need less electricity to cool our refrigerators or charge our
phones. For the fuel we burn, let's get the most bang for our buck.
All of these options are not new ideas. They're based on proven
technologies, proven approaches, and are part of the ongoing story of
energy progress in America. Our plan doesn't prescribe—it propels that
progress already underway.
And like I said, there's no one-size-fits-all solution. States can pick
from a portfolio of options to meet regional, state, and community
needs—from ones I mentioned, or the many more I didn't, and in any
combination. It's up to states to mix and match to get to their goal.
If states don't want to go it alone, they can join up with a multi-state
market based program, or make new ones. More players mean more flexibility
and lower costs. States have flexibility not just in means and method, but
in timeline, too. Under our proposal, states have to design plans now, and
start reducing so they're on a trajectory to meet their final goals in
2030. That kind of flexibility means a smooth transition to cleaner power
that doesn't leave investments behind.
The flexibility of our Clean Power Plan affords states the choices that
lead them to a healthier future: Choices that level the playing field, and
keep options on the table, not off. Choices that reflect where we are
today, and look to seize opportunities for tomorrow. Choices that are
focused on building up, not shutting down, so we can raise the common
denominator for a cleaner, low carbon economy that'll fuel growth for
decades to come.
What's special about the flexibility of our plan is that it doesn't just
give states more options—it gives entrepreneurs and investors more options,
too. It'll deliver the certainty that will unleash market forces that drive
even more innovation and investment, and spur even cleaner power and all
sorts of new low-carbon technologies. Our Plan pulls private investment
off the shelves and into our clean energy revolution, and sends it in every
direction, not just one or two. The opportunities are tremendous.
The good news is states, cities, and businesses have already blazed the
trail. Our clean energy revolution is unfolding in front of us. Just in the
past few weeks, I went to Salt Lake City, where the mayor and utilities are
teaming up on efficiency. I went to St. Paul, where a science center is
recycling energy waste, saving money and teaching kids what we adults are
just learning. I've seen fortune 500 companies revamp strategies to lower
business risk by meeting the demands of a carbon constrained future.
I want to give a shout out to all the local officials, rural co-ops, public
power operators, and investor owned utilities leading on climate change:
It's clear that you act not just because it's reasonable, but because it's
the right thing to do for the people you serve. Governors and mayors of all
stripes are leaning into climate action. They see it not as a partisan
obstacle, but as a powerful opportunity. And we know that success breeds
success. Those of us who've worked in state and local government have seen
healthy competition push states to share ideas and expertise. That's when
everybody wins.
EPA has had a longstanding partnership with states to protect public
health. We set goals, and states are in the driver's seat to meet them. So
releasing the Clean Power Plan shifts the conversation to states. If you're
a teacher, scientist, mechanic, business person—or just someone with a good
idea—share your thoughts with your state leaders. Help them see how they
can build a plan that will better our future.
I know people are wondering: can we cut pollution while keeping our energy
affordable and reliable? We can, and we will. Critics claim your energy
bills will skyrocket. They're wrong. Any small, short-term change in
electricity prices would be within normal fluctuations the power sector
already deals with. And any small price increase—think about the price of
a gallon of milk a month—is dwarfed by huge benefits. This is an investment
in better health and a better future for our kids.
In 2030, the Clean Power Plan will deliver climate and health benefits of
up to $90 billion dollars. And for soot and smog reductions alone, that
means for every dollar we invest in the plan, families will see $7 dollars
in health benefits. And if states are smart about taking advantage of
efficiency opportunities, and I know they are, when the effects of this
plan are in place in 2030, average electricity bills will be 8 percent
cheaper.
This plan is a down payment on a more efficient, 21st century power system
that cuts energy waste, cuts pollution, and cuts costs. It's a proven
path—a lot of states have been doing it for years. Think about it like
this: we set historic fuel efficiency standards that will double the
distance our cars go on a gallon of gas. That means you fill up less often,
and save more money. Efficiency is a win for our planet and our
pocketbooks. And given the astronomical price we pay for climate inaction,
the most costly thing we can do; is to do nothing.
The critics are wrong about reliability, too. For decades, power plants
have met pollution limits without risking reliability. If anything, what
threatens reliability and causes blackouts is devastating extreme weather
fueled by climate change. I'm tired of people pointing to the Polar Vortex
as a reason not to act on climate. It's exactly the opposite. Climate
change heightens risks from extreme cold that freezes power grids,
superstorms that drown power plants, and heat waves that stress power
supplies. And it turns out, efficiency upgrades that slow climate change
actually help cities insulate against blackouts.
Despite all that, there are still special interest skeptics who will cry
the sky is falling. Who will deliberately ignore the risks, overestimate
the costs, and undervalue the benefits. But the facts are clear. For over
four decades, EPA has cut air pollution by 70 percent and the economy has
more than tripled. All while providing the power we need to keep America
strong. Climate action doesn't dull America's competitive edge—it sharpens
it. It spurs ingenuity, innovation, and investment. In 2011, we exported
almost 33 percent more cars than we did in 2009—a clear sign of a
competitive industry. And our fuel efficiency standards strengthen that.
Companies like Best Buy are investing in low-carbon operations. Bank of
America pays its employees to cut carbon pollution, because investors see
climate risk as business opportunity. Any business will tell you
eliminating waste means more money for other things, like hiring employees.
Corporate climate action is not bells and whistles—it's all hands on deck.
And even without national standards, the energy sector sees the writing on
the wall. Businesses like Spectra Energy are investing billions in clean
energy. And utilities like Exelon and Entergy are weaving climate
considerations into business plans. All this means more jobs, not less.
We'll need thousands of American workers, in construction, transmission,
and more, to make cleaner power a reality.
The bottom line is: we have never—nor will we ever—have to choose between a
healthy economy and a healthy environment.
There's a reason empty allegations from critics sound like a broken record.
It's the same tired play from the same special-interest playbook they've
used for decades. In the '60s, when smog choked our cities, critics cried
wolf and said EPA action would put the brakes on auto production. They were
wrong. Instead, our air got cleaner, our kids got healthier—and we sold
more cars. In the '90s, critics cried wolf and said fighting acid rain
would make electricity bills go up and our lights go out. They said
industry would, quote, "die a quiet death." Wrong again. Industry is alive
and well, our lights are still on, and we've dramatically reduced acid
rain.
Time after time, when science pointed to health risks, special interests
cried wolf to protect their own agenda. And time after time, we followed
the science, protected the American people, and the doomsday predictions
never came true. Now, climate change is calling our number. And right on
cue, those same critics once will flaunt manufactured facts and
scare-tactics, standing in our way of our right to breathe clean air, to
keep our communities safe, and to meet our moral duty as stewards of our
natural resources.
Their claims that the science-driven action that's protected families for
generations would somehow harm us flies in the face of history, and shows a
lack of faith in American ingenuity and entrepreneurship.
I don't accept that premise. We can lead this fight. We can innovate our
way to a better future. It's what America does best. Yes, our climate
crisis is a global problem that demands a global solution, and there's no
Hail Mary play we can call to reverse its effects. But we can act today to
advance the ball and limit the dangers of punting the problem to our kids.
It's no accident that our proposal is a key piece of President Obama's
Climate Action Plan—and key to American leadership in our global climate
fight. Although there's still much work to do to get carbon pollution down
to safe levels, I'm hopeful when I see the progress we've made. I'm hopeful
because I see the pattern of perseverance that defines America.
From the light bulb to the locomotive; from photovoltaic cells to
cellphones, America has always turned small steps into giant leaps. We've
cured diseases, we've explored the stars, we've connected corners of the
globe with the click of a mouse, because when critics say it can't be done,
we say—watch us. That's what America is made of. We don't settle. We lead.
And that's how we'll confront our climate crisis.
When it comes to our Plan, we may not agree on details of how we do it, but
we agree on why we do it. When our kids ask us if we did everything we
could to leave them a safer, cleaner world, we want to say, yes, we did.
When we think of our children—kids like Parker from Cleveland, Ohio—it's
easy to see why we're compelled to act.
As governors and mayors, as CEOs and school teachers, and most of all, as
parents, we have a moral obligation to ensure the world we leave behind is
as safe, healthy, and vibrant as the one we inherited. Our Clean Power Plan
is a huge step toward delivering on that promise.
Thank you very much.
State
EPA goal for Mississippi is to cut carbon by 38 percent by 2030
The Associated Press
June 02, 2014 at 6:15 PM
JACKSON, Mississippi -- The federal government is proposing that
Mississippi's carbon dioxide emissions from power plants be 38 percent
lower by year 2030 compared to 2005.
http://blog.gulflive.com/mississippi-press-news/2014/06/epa_goal_for_mississippi_is_to.html#incart_river
Groundworx attorney to council: "We're on a very short fuse."
WDAM
HATTIESBURG, MS (WDAM) -Hattiesburg's wastewater treatment project
continues to move forward even though the city is stalling on financing the
project.
http://www.wdam.com/story/25674986/groundworx-attorney-to-council-were-on-a-very-short-fuse
Groundworx threatens suit over stalled wastewater works
Hattiesburg American
It proved to be an information-laden Monday evening at the City
Council chambers when it came to the city's stalled efforts to
revamp its sewage treatment and wastewater disposal system.
http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/story/news/local/hattiesburg/2014/06/02/hattiesburg-groundworx-kim-bradley-deborah-delgado-henry-naylor/9896161/
Heavy rains and pounding surf turn beaches into a big mess
WLOX
HARRISON COUNTY, MS (WLOX) -You'll be seeing a lot of heavy beach cleaning
equipment in the coming days. Debris and seaweed line the beach in Harrison
County. Chuck Loftis is the Sand Beach Director.
http://www.wlox.com/story/25670051/recent-rains-bring-debris-erosion-to-harrison-county-beaches
Purple Creek Bank Eroding Causing Concerns for Residents
WJTV
JACKSON, Miss. - "It really does concern me because I own my home, I'm old
and I'm not about to move," says Frances Mabry. She says she's desperate to
get the Purple Creek bank behind her home to fixed. She claims it's quickly
eroding and could do some major damaged if it's not stopped.
http://www.wjtv.com/story/25673827/purple-creek-bank-eroding-causing-concerns-for-residents
Regional
Controlled burn planned after oil spill in Delta National Wildlife Refuge
Ken Daley
The Times-Picayune
June 02, 2014 at 8:52 PM
Officials from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Coast Guard
announced Monday they were working to mitigate damage from a spill of crude
oil within the Delta National Wildlife Refuge.
http://www.nola.com/environment/index.ssf/2014/06/authorities_work_to_contain_50.html
Louisiana lawmakers quick to condemn Obama administration plan to reduce
carbon emissions
Bruce Alpert
Times-Picayune
June 02, 2014 at 3:31 PM
WASHINGTON -- Louisiana congressional members Monday quickly condemned the
Obama administrations bold plan to reduce carbon emissions from existing
power plants by 30 percent in 16 years.
http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/06/louisiana_lawmakers_quick_to_c.html#incart_river
Bentley says carbon emissions plan unfair to Southern states
Tuscaloosa News
By Patrick Rupinski
Gov. Robert Bentley said Monday that President Barack Obama's plan to
reduce carbon emissions puts an unfair burden on Southern states.
http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20140602/news/140609953?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
National
EPA proposes cutting carbon dioxide emissions from coal plants 30% by 2030
Washington Post
By Juliet Eilperin and Steven Mufson,
The Environmental Protection Agency proposed a regulation Monday that would
cut carbon dioxide emissions from existing coal plants by up to to 30
percent by 2030 compared with 2005 levels, taking aim at one of the
nation's leading sources of greenhouse gases.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/epa-to-propose-cutting-carbon-dioxide-emissions-from-coal-plants-30percent-by-2030/2014/06/01/f5055d94-e9a8-11e3-9f5c-9075d5508f0a_story.html
Taking Page From Health Care Act, Obama Climate Plan Relies on States
NY Times
By CORAL DAVENPORT and PETER BAKER
JUNE 2, 2014
WASHINGTON — President Obama's new plan to fight climate
change depends heavily on states' devising individual
approaches to meeting goals set in the nation's capital, a
strategy similar to the one he used to expand health care,
often with rocky results.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/03/us/politics/obama-epa-rule-coal-carbon-pollution-power-plants.html?ref=earth&_r=0
Utilities Size Up Emission Cap for Power Plants
Coal Producers Find Relief in Certain Elements of the EPA's Plan
Wall Street Journal
New federal limits on greenhouse-gas emissions would force sweeping changes
in the U.S. electric system but wouldn't deliver the knockout blow to coal
that mining companies and some power producers had feared.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/greenhouse-gas-emissions-limits-likely-to-drive-up-electricity-prices-1401715727
EPA Plan Stokes Posturing in Midterm Elections
GOP Lawmakers Say Proposal Will Kill Jobs; Administration Says it Will
Promote Energy Efficiency
Wall Street Journal
WASHINGTON—President Barack Obama's plan to reduce carbon emissions is
escalating environmental policy fights in energy-rich states, home to many
of the marquee races that could determine which party controls the Senate
after November's elections.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/epa-proposal-draws-fire-from-united-republicans-some-democrats-1401737527
New pollution rule puts onus on states to cut carbon emissions
New pollution rule puts onus on states to reduce carbon emissions
BY CHRIS ADAMS AND LESLEY CLARK
McClatchy Washington BureauJune 2, 2014
WASHINGTON -- A major initiative to cut the pollution emitted from the
nation's power plants set off a scramble Monday in Washington -- where
Republicans instantly pounced on the proposed rules -- and in states, where
much of the work in implementing the rules will be done.
http://www.sunherald.com/2014/06/02/5620410/new-pollution-rule-puts-onus-on.html?sp=/99/102/
Press Releases
Remarks for Administrator McCarthy, Announcement of Clean Power Plan,
Washington, DC
WASHINGTON- About a month ago, I took a trip to the Cleveland Clinic. I met
a lot of great people, but one stood out—even if he needed to stand on a
chair to do it. Parker Frey is 10 years old. He's struggled with severe
asthma all his life. His mom said despite his challenges, Parker's a tough,
active kid—and a stellar hockey player.
But sometimes, she says, the air is too dangerous for him to play outside.
In the United States of America, no parent should ever have that worry.
That's why EPA exists. Our job, directed by our laws, reaffirmed by our
courts, is to protect public health and the environment. Climate change,
fueled by carbon pollution, supercharges risks not just to our health, but
to our communities, our economy, and our way of life. That's why EPA is
delivering on a vital piece of President Obama's Climate Action Plan.
I want to thank Janet McCabe, our Acting Assistant Administrator at the
Office of Air and Radiation, and the entire EPA team who worked so hard to
deliver this proposal. They should be very proud of their work; I know I
am.
Today, EPA is proposing a Clean Power Plan that will cut carbon pollution
from our power sector, by using cleaner energy sources, and cutting energy
waste.
Although we limit pollutants like mercury, sulfur, and arsenic, currently,
there are no limits on carbon pollution from power plants, our nation's
largest source. For the sake of our families' health and our kids' future,
we have a moral obligation to act on climate. When we do, we'll turn
climate risk into business opportunity, we'll spur innovation and
investment, and we'll build a world-leading clean energy economy.
The science is clear. The risks are clear. And the high costs of climate
inaction keep piling up.
Rising temperatures bring more smog, more asthma, and longer allergy
seasons. If your kid doesn't use an inhaler, consider yourself a lucky
parent, because 1 in 10 children in the U.S. suffers from asthma. Carbon
pollution from power plants comes packaged with other dangerous pollutants
like particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide, putting our
families at even more risk.
Climate inaction is costing us more money, in more places, more often. 2012
was the second most expensive year in U.S. history for natural disasters.
Even the largest sectors of our economy buckle under the pressures of a
changing climate, and when they give way, so do businesses that support
them, and local economics that depend on them.
As our seas rise, so do insurance premiums, property taxes, and food
prices. If we do nothing, in our grandkids' lifetimes, temperatures could
rise 10 degrees and seas could rise 4 feet. The S&P recently said climate
change will continue to affect credit risk worldwide.
This is not just about disappearing polar bears or melting ice caps. This
is about protecting our health and our homes. This is about protecting
local economies and jobs.
The time to act is now. That's why President Obama laid out a Climate
Action Plan—to cut carbon pollution, build a more resilient nation, and
lead the world in our global climate fight.
Today's proposed Clean Power Plan is a critical step forward. Before we put
pen to paper, we asked for your advice. Our plan was built on that
advice—from states, cities, businesses, utilities, and thousands of people.
Today kicks off our second phase of crucial engagement.
Shaped by public input, present trends, proven technologies, and common
sense, our Plan aims to cut energy waste and leverage cleaner energy
sources by doing two things: First, setting achievable, enforceable state
goals to cut carbon pollution per megawatt hour of electricity generated.
And second, laying out a national framework that gives states the
flexibility to chart their own, customized path to meet their goals.
All told, in 2030 when states meet their goals, our proposal will result in
30 percent less carbon pollution from the power sector across the U.S. when
compared with 2005 levels. That's like cancelling out annual carbon
pollution from two thirds of all cars and trucks in America. And if you add
up what we'll avoid between now and 2030—it's more than double the carbon
pollution from every power plant in America in 2012.
As a bonus, in 2030 we'll cut pollution that causes smog and soot 25
percent more than if we didn't have this plan in place. The first year that
these standards go into effect, we'll avoid up to 100,000 asthma attacks
and 2,100 heart attacks—and those numbers go up from there.
That means lower medical bills and fewer trips to the emergency room,
especially for those most vulnerable like our children, our elderly, and
our infirmed. This is about environmental justice, too, because lower
income families, and communities of color are hardest hit.
Now let me get into the details of our proposal.
This plan is all about flexibility. That's what makes it ambitious, but
achievable. That's how we can keep our energy affordable and reliable. The
glue that holds this plan together, and the key to making it work, is that
each state's goal is tailored to its own circumstances, and states have the
flexibility to reach their goal in whatever way works best for them.
First, to craft state goals, we looked at where states are today, and we
followed where they're going. Each state is different, so each goal, and
each path, can be different.
Second, the goals spring from smart and sensible opportunities that states
and businesses are taking advantage of right now. From plant to plug.
Let me tell you about the kinds of opportunities I'm talking about:
We know that coal and natural gas play a significant role in a diverse
national energy mix. This Plan does not change that—it recognizes the
opportunity to modernize aging plants, increase efficiency, and lower
pollution. That's part of an all-of-the-above strategy that paves a more
certain path for conventional fuels in a carbon constrained world.
States also have the opportunity to shift their reliance to more efficient,
less polluting plants. Or, instead of low carbon sources, there's always
the opportunity to shift to "no" carbon sources like nuclear, wind, and
solar. Since 2009, wind energy in America has tripled and solar has grown
ten-fold. Our nuclear fleet continues to supply zero carbon baseload power.
Homegrown clean energy is posting record revenues and creating jobs that
can't be shipped overseas.
Those are all opportunities at plants, but what about at the plug? Existing
technologies can squeeze the most out of every electron, helping us use
electricity more efficiently in our homes and businesses. More efficiency
means we need less electricity to cool our refrigerators or charge our
phones. For the fuel we burn, let's get the most bang for our buck.
All of these options are not new ideas. They're based on proven
technologies, proven approaches, and are part of the ongoing story of
energy progress in America. Our plan doesn't prescribe—it propels that
progress already underway.
And like I said, there's no one-size-fits-all solution. States can pick
from a portfolio of options to meet regional, state, and community
needs—from ones I mentioned, or the many more I didn't, and in any
combination. It's up to states to mix and match to get to their goal.
If states don't want to go it alone, they can join up with a multi-state
market based program, or make new ones. More players mean more flexibility
and lower costs. States have flexibility not just in means and method, but
in timeline, too. Under our proposal, states have to design plans now, and
start reducing so they're on a trajectory to meet their final goals in
2030. That kind of flexibility means a smooth transition to cleaner power
that doesn't leave investments behind.
The flexibility of our Clean Power Plan affords states the choices that
lead them to a healthier future: Choices that level the playing field, and
keep options on the table, not off. Choices that reflect where we are
today, and look to seize opportunities for tomorrow. Choices that are
focused on building up, not shutting down, so we can raise the common
denominator for a cleaner, low carbon economy that'll fuel growth for
decades to come.
What's special about the flexibility of our plan is that it doesn't just
give states more options—it gives entrepreneurs and investors more options,
too. It'll deliver the certainty that will unleash market forces that drive
even more innovation and investment, and spur even cleaner power and all
sorts of new low-carbon technologies. Our Plan pulls private investment
off the shelves and into our clean energy revolution, and sends it in every
direction, not just one or two. The opportunities are tremendous.
The good news is states, cities, and businesses have already blazed the
trail. Our clean energy revolution is unfolding in front of us. Just in the
past few weeks, I went to Salt Lake City, where the mayor and utilities are
teaming up on efficiency. I went to St. Paul, where a science center is
recycling energy waste, saving money and teaching kids what we adults are
just learning. I've seen fortune 500 companies revamp strategies to lower
business risk by meeting the demands of a carbon constrained future.
I want to give a shout out to all the local officials, rural co-ops, public
power operators, and investor owned utilities leading on climate change:
It's clear that you act not just because it's reasonable, but because it's
the right thing to do for the people you serve. Governors and mayors of all
stripes are leaning into climate action. They see it not as a partisan
obstacle, but as a powerful opportunity. And we know that success breeds
success. Those of us who've worked in state and local government have seen
healthy competition push states to share ideas and expertise. That's when
everybody wins.
EPA has had a longstanding partnership with states to protect public
health. We set goals, and states are in the driver's seat to meet them. So
releasing the Clean Power Plan shifts the conversation to states. If you're
a teacher, scientist, mechanic, business person—or just someone with a good
idea—share your thoughts with your state leaders. Help them see how they
can build a plan that will better our future.
I know people are wondering: can we cut pollution while keeping our energy
affordable and reliable? We can, and we will. Critics claim your energy
bills will skyrocket. They're wrong. Any small, short-term change in
electricity prices would be within normal fluctuations the power sector
already deals with. And any small price increase—think about the price of
a gallon of milk a month—is dwarfed by huge benefits. This is an investment
in better health and a better future for our kids.
In 2030, the Clean Power Plan will deliver climate and health benefits of
up to $90 billion dollars. And for soot and smog reductions alone, that
means for every dollar we invest in the plan, families will see $7 dollars
in health benefits. And if states are smart about taking advantage of
efficiency opportunities, and I know they are, when the effects of this
plan are in place in 2030, average electricity bills will be 8 percent
cheaper.
This plan is a down payment on a more efficient, 21st century power system
that cuts energy waste, cuts pollution, and cuts costs. It's a proven
path—a lot of states have been doing it for years. Think about it like
this: we set historic fuel efficiency standards that will double the
distance our cars go on a gallon of gas. That means you fill up less often,
and save more money. Efficiency is a win for our planet and our
pocketbooks. And given the astronomical price we pay for climate inaction,
the most costly thing we can do; is to do nothing.
The critics are wrong about reliability, too. For decades, power plants
have met pollution limits without risking reliability. If anything, what
threatens reliability and causes blackouts is devastating extreme weather
fueled by climate change. I'm tired of people pointing to the Polar Vortex
as a reason not to act on climate. It's exactly the opposite. Climate
change heightens risks from extreme cold that freezes power grids,
superstorms that drown power plants, and heat waves that stress power
supplies. And it turns out, efficiency upgrades that slow climate change
actually help cities insulate against blackouts.
Despite all that, there are still special interest skeptics who will cry
the sky is falling. Who will deliberately ignore the risks, overestimate
the costs, and undervalue the benefits. But the facts are clear. For over
four decades, EPA has cut air pollution by 70 percent and the economy has
more than tripled. All while providing the power we need to keep America
strong. Climate action doesn't dull America's competitive edge—it sharpens
it. It spurs ingenuity, innovation, and investment. In 2011, we exported
almost 33 percent more cars than we did in 2009—a clear sign of a
competitive industry. And our fuel efficiency standards strengthen that.
Companies like Best Buy are investing in low-carbon operations. Bank of
America pays its employees to cut carbon pollution, because investors see
climate risk as business opportunity. Any business will tell you
eliminating waste means more money for other things, like hiring employees.
Corporate climate action is not bells and whistles—it's all hands on deck.
And even without national standards, the energy sector sees the writing on
the wall. Businesses like Spectra Energy are investing billions in clean
energy. And utilities like Exelon and Entergy are weaving climate
considerations into business plans. All this means more jobs, not less.
We'll need thousands of American workers, in construction, transmission,
and more, to make cleaner power a reality.
The bottom line is: we have never—nor will we ever—have to choose between a
healthy economy and a healthy environment.
There's a reason empty allegations from critics sound like a broken record.
It's the same tired play from the same special-interest playbook they've
used for decades. In the '60s, when smog choked our cities, critics cried
wolf and said EPA action would put the brakes on auto production. They were
wrong. Instead, our air got cleaner, our kids got healthier—and we sold
more cars. In the '90s, critics cried wolf and said fighting acid rain
would make electricity bills go up and our lights go out. They said
industry would, quote, "die a quiet death." Wrong again. Industry is alive
and well, our lights are still on, and we've dramatically reduced acid
rain.
Time after time, when science pointed to health risks, special interests
cried wolf to protect their own agenda. And time after time, we followed
the science, protected the American people, and the doomsday predictions
never came true. Now, climate change is calling our number. And right on
cue, those same critics once will flaunt manufactured facts and
scare-tactics, standing in our way of our right to breathe clean air, to
keep our communities safe, and to meet our moral duty as stewards of our
natural resources.
Their claims that the science-driven action that's protected families for
generations would somehow harm us flies in the face of history, and shows a
lack of faith in American ingenuity and entrepreneurship.
I don't accept that premise. We can lead this fight. We can innovate our
way to a better future. It's what America does best. Yes, our climate
crisis is a global problem that demands a global solution, and there's no
Hail Mary play we can call to reverse its effects. But we can act today to
advance the ball and limit the dangers of punting the problem to our kids.
It's no accident that our proposal is a key piece of President Obama's
Climate Action Plan—and key to American leadership in our global climate
fight. Although there's still much work to do to get carbon pollution down
to safe levels, I'm hopeful when I see the progress we've made. I'm hopeful
because I see the pattern of perseverance that defines America.
From the light bulb to the locomotive; from photovoltaic cells to
cellphones, America has always turned small steps into giant leaps. We've
cured diseases, we've explored the stars, we've connected corners of the
globe with the click of a mouse, because when critics say it can't be done,
we say—watch us. That's what America is made of. We don't settle. We lead.
And that's how we'll confront our climate crisis.
When it comes to our Plan, we may not agree on details of how we do it, but
we agree on why we do it. When our kids ask us if we did everything we
could to leave them a safer, cleaner world, we want to say, yes, we did.
When we think of our children—kids like Parker from Cleveland, Ohio—it's
easy to see why we're compelled to act.
As governors and mayors, as CEOs and school teachers, and most of all, as
parents, we have a moral obligation to ensure the world we leave behind is
as safe, healthy, and vibrant as the one we inherited. Our Clean Power Plan
is a huge step toward delivering on that promise.
Thank you very much.
Monday, June 2, 2014
News Clippings 6/2/14
6.2.2014
Oil Spill
BP and Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries debate fishing areas
still closed from oil spill
Benjamin Alexander-Bloch
The Times-Picayune
May 30, 2014 at 4:06 PM
Following a Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries statement this
week labeling shrimp from areas still closed from the 2010 BP Deepwater
Horizon oil spill a "public health risk," BP took the offensive stating it
was "at a complete loss to understand the basis for LDWF's actions."
http://www.nola.com/environment/index.ssf/2014/05/bp_and_louisiana_department_of.html#incart_river
Louisiana lawmakers divide expected oil spill recovery funds
AP
BATON ROUGE — Louisiana lawmakers want to steer Gulf oil spill recovery
money to help refill the state's "rainy day" fund and an elderly trust fund
that was raided to fill budget holes.
http://www.shreveporttimes.com/viewart/20140531/NEWS01/305310034/Louisiana-lawmakers-divide-expected-oil-spill-recovery-funds
July 9 hearing set in BP employees' criminal case
AP
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A federal appeals court has set a July 9 hearing in the
manslaughter case against two BP employees charged in connection with the
2010 Deepwater Horizon explosion that killed 11 offshore rig workers.
http://www.sfgate.com/news/texas/article/July-9-hearing-set-in-BP-employees-criminal-case-5518588.php
State
Judge will not dismiss DEQ public records lawsuit
Clarion Ledger
The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality failed to
convince a judge that its wholesale redaction of invoices totaling
some $6 million didn't violate the state Public Records Act.
http://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/2014/05/30/judge-will-dismiss-deq-public-records-lawsuit/9799811/
Gulfport works to tackle illegal dumping problem
WLOX
GULFPORT, MS (WLOX) -If you live in Gulfport, you know that the city is
tackling illegal dumping by giving residents a more convenient way to get
rid of items they don't want. Keep Gulfport Clean and Green is a city wide
anti-litter campaign and part of the strategy to create a cleaner city by
temporarily placing dumpsters in residential neighborhoods.
http://www.wlox.com/story/25656178/gulfport-tries-to-tackle-illegal-dumping
Mississippi red snapper count begin Sunday night, forms available
Mississippi Press
May 31, 2014 at 7:57 AM
BILOXI, Mississippi -- The Mississippi Department of Marine Resources is
asking recreational fishermen to participate in a voluntary reporting
program for red snapper during the 2014 season.
http://blog.gulflive.com/mississippi-press-news/2014/05/mississippi_red_snapper_count.html
ANALYSIS: Despite officials acting in 'bad faith,' DMR records reach
newspaper
Sun Herald
BY ANITA LEE
More than 17 months after the Sun Herald requested business records from
what was then a scandal-ridden agency, the state Department of Marine
Resources, those records have finally reached the newspaper's office.
http://www.sunherald.com/2014/05/30/5614030/despite-officials-acting-in-bad.html?sp=/99/184/832/
Regional
Louisiana's regulation and inspection of oil and gas wells, including
'orphaned' wells, is inadequate, Legislative Auditor finds
Mark Schleifstein
The Times-Picayune
June 02, 2014 at 6:16 AM
The state Department of Natural Resources' Office of Conservation is doing
an inadequate job of regulating and inspecting the state's oil and gas
wells, and is not properly overseeing a growing number of "orphaned" wells
abandoned by private operators, according to a report released Monday by
Legislative Auditor Daryl Purpera.
http://www.nola.com/environment/index.ssf/2014/06/louisianas_regulation_and_insp.html#incart_river
National
EPA seeks to cut power plant carbon by 30 percent
BY DINA CAPPIELLO
Associated Press
June 2, 2014
WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Monday will roll out a
plan to cut carbon dioxide emissions from power plants by 30 percent by
2030, setting the first national limits on the chief gas linked to global
warming.
http://www.sunherald.com/2014/06/02/5617949/epa-seeks-to-cut-power-plant-carbon.html?sp=/99/102/
EPA to Seek 30% Cut in Emissions at Power Plants
Plan Sets in Motion Main Piece of President's Climate-Change Agenda
Wall Street Journal
WASHINGTON—The Environmental Protection Agency will propose mandating power
plants cut U.S. carbon-dioxide emissions 30% by 2030 from levels of 25
years earlier, according to people briefed on the rule, an ambitious target
that marks the first-ever attempt at limiting such pollution.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/epa-carbon-emissions-rules-carry-political-risks-for-some-democrats-1401658355
Q&A: What Will EPA's Climate-Change Rule Do?
Wall Street Journal
President Barack Obama is tackling climate change through regulation. With
a proposed rule being announced Monday, the Environmental Protection Agency
is using the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from
hundreds of power plants across the U.S. though complex proposal running
hundreds of pages. Here is a Q&A:
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/06/02/qa-what-will-epas-climate-change-rule-do/
States move to blunt Obama carbon reduction plan to be announced Monday
The Associated Press
June 01, 2014 at 8:07 PM
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) -- As President Barack Obama prepares to announce
tougher new air quality standards, lawmakers in several states already are
trying to blunt the impact on aging coal-fired power plants that feed
electricity to millions of consumers.
http://blog.gulflive.com/mississippi-press-news/2014/06/states_move_to_blunt_obama_car.html#incart_river
Trying to Reclaim Leadership on Climate Change
NY Times
By JUSTIN GILLIS and HENRY FOUNTAIN
JUNE 1, 2014
At the end of his first year in office, President Obama
flew to Copenhagen and made a big promise: that the United
States would cut its greenhouse gas emissions
substantially by 2020 — a bold and risky pledge that
hinged on a balky Congress to make it possible. His
efforts became bogged down within months, and Mr. Obama's
pledge to the rest of the world soon looked like a pipe
dream.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/02/us/politics/obama-tries-to-reclaim-leadership-on-climate-change.html?ref=earth&_r=0
Obama administration to announce controversial emissions cap on power
plants
Published June 02, 2014
FoxNews.com
The Obama administration on Monday is set to announce the first-ever
national limits on carbon emissions from existing power plants, a
controversial regulation aimed at fulfilling a key plank of President
Obama's climate change agenda.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/02/obama-to-announce-rule-to-limit-emissions-from-fossil-burning-plants-part-his/
Fracking wells possible culprit of Texas earthquakes
USA Today
RENO, Texas — The first time the earth shook their home, David and
Meredith Hull thought it was a propane tank exploding outside, an
odd but rare phenomenon.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/01/earthquakes-texas-fracking-wells/9765659/
White House Proposes Updated Great Lakes Plan
By JOHN FLESHER AP Environmental Writer
The Obama administration on Friday proposed an updated five-year blueprint
for Great Lakes environmental protection that would put greater emphasis on
climate change and using science to choose cleanup projects.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/administration-proposes-updated-great-lakes-plan-23929604
Press Releases
EPA Proposes First Guidelines to Cut Carbon Pollution from Existing Power
Plants
Clean Power Plan is flexible proposal to ensure a healthier environment,
spur innovation and strengthen the economy
WASHINGTON – At the direction of President Obama and after an unprecedented
outreach effort, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is today
releasing the Clean Power Plan proposal, which for the first time cuts
carbon pollution from existing power plants, the single largest source of
carbon pollution in the United States. Today's proposal will protect public
health, move the United States toward a cleaner environment and fight
climate change while supplying Americans with reliable and affordable
power.
"Climate change, fueled by carbon pollution, supercharges risks to our
health, our economy, and our way of life. EPA is delivering on a vital
piece of President Obama's Climate Action Plan by proposing a Clean Power
Plan that will cut harmful carbon pollution from our largest source--power
plants," said EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy. "By leveraging cleaner
energy sources and cutting energy waste, this plan will clean the air we
breathe while helping slow climate change so we can leave a safe and
healthy future for our kids. We don't have to choose between a healthy
economy and a healthy environment--our action will sharpen America's
competitive edge, spur innovation, and create jobs."
Power plants account for roughly one-third of all domestic greenhouse gas
emissions in the United States. While there are limits in place for the
level of arsenic, mercury, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particle
pollution that power plants can emit, there are currently no national
limits on carbon pollution levels.
With the Clean Power Plan, EPA is proposing guidelines that build on trends
already underway in states and the power sector to cut carbon pollution
from existing power plants, making them more efficient and less polluting.
This proposal follows through on the common-sense steps laid out in
President Obama's Climate Action Plan and the June 2013 Presidential
Memorandum.
By 2030, the steady and responsible steps EPA is taking will:
· Cut carbon emission from the power sector by 30 percent nationwide
below 2005 levels, which is equal to the emissions from powering more
than half the homes in the United States for one year;
· Cut particle pollution, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide by more
than 25 percent as a co-benefit;
· Avoid up to 6,600 premature deaths, up to 150,000 asthma attacks in
children, and up to 490,000 missed work or school days—providing up
to $93 billion in climate and public health benefits; and
· Shrink electricity bills roughly 8 percent by increasing energy
efficiency and reducing demand in the electricity system.
The Clean Power Plan will be implemented through a state-federal
partnership under which states identify a path forward using either current
or new electricity production and pollution control policies to meet the
goals of the proposed program. The proposal provides guidelines for states
to develop plans to meet state-specific goals to reduce carbon pollution
and gives them the flexibility to design a program that makes the most
sense for their unique situation. States can choose the right mix of
generation using diverse fuels, energy efficiency and demand-side
management to meet the goals and their own needs. It allows them to work
alone to develop individual plans or to work together with other states to
develop multi-state plans.
Also included in today's proposal is a flexible timeline for states to
follow for submitting plans to the agency—with plans due in June 2016, with
the option to use a two-step process for submitting final plans if more
time is needed. States that have already invested in energy efficiency
programs will be able to build on these programs during the compliance
period to help make progress toward meeting their goal.
Since last summer, EPA has directly engaged with state, tribal, and local
governments, industry and labor leaders, non-profits, and others. The data,
information and feedback provided during this effort helped guide the
development of the proposal and further confirmed that states have been
leading the way for years in saving families and businesses money through
improving efficiency, while cleaning up pollution from power plants. To
date, 47 states have utilities that run demand-side energy efficiency
programs, 38 have renewable portfolio standards or goals, and 10 have
market-based greenhouse gas emissions programs. Together, the agency
believes that these programs represent a proven, common-sense approach to
cutting carbon pollution—one in which electricity is generated and used as
efficiently as possible and which promotes a greater reliance on
lower-carbon power sources.
Today's announcement marks the beginning of the second phase of the
agency's outreach efforts. EPA will accept comment on the proposal for 120
days after publication in the Federal Register and will hold four public
hearings on the proposed Clean Power Plan during the week of July 28 in the
following cities: Denver, Atlanta, Washington, DC and Pittsburgh. Based on
this input, EPA will finalize standards next June following the schedule
laid out in the June 2013 Presidential Memorandum.
In 2009, EPA determined that greenhouse gas pollution threatens Americans'
health and welfare by leading to long lasting changes in our climate that
can have a range of negative effects on human health and the environment.
Taking steady, responsible steps to cut carbon pollution from existing
power plants will protect children's health and will move our nation toward
a cleaner, more stable environment for future generations, while supplying
the reliable, affordable power needed for economic growth.
Fact sheets and details about the proposed rule available at:
http://www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan
More information on President Obama's Climate Action Plan:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/climate-change
Video on today's announcement from Administrator Gina McCarthy:
http://www.epa.gov/
EPA and Reckitt Benckiser Inc. Reach Agreement to Cancel Certain
Rodenticide Products
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reached
agreement with Reckitt Benckiser Inc. to cancel 12 d-CON mouse and rat
poison products that do not currently comply with EPA safety standards.
"Millions of households use mouse and rat poison products each year.
Canceling these products will help prevent risks to children, pets and
wildlife," said Jim Jones, Assistant Administrator for EPA's Office of
Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. "This voluntary move will get us
far faster results than would otherwise be achieved through an
administrative process."
Before EPA tightened the safety standards for household rat and mouse
poison products, more than 10,000 children a year were accidentally
exposed. Since the new standard took effect, the number of children exposed
has decreased. The agency worked with a number of companies to develop
safer mouse and rat poison products that are effective, affordable and
widely available.
The cancellation of these 12 d-CON products that do not comply with current
standards will continue the trend of reduced exposure to children, pets and
wildlife. The company has agreed to stop production by the end of the year
and stop distribution to retailers by March 31, 2015. The new standards
require consumer mouse and rat poison products to be housed in protective
bait stations.
Pellets and other bait forms that cannot be secured in bait stations are
prohibited. EPA also prohibits the sale of products containing
brodifacoum, bromadiolone, difethialone and difenacoum to residential
consumers because of their greater risk to wildlife such as mountain lions,
eagles, wolves and foxes.
For more information, visit:
http://www2.epa.gov/rodenticides/canceling-some-d-con-mouse-and-rat-control-products
For a complete list of the homeowner use rat and mouse products that meet
EPA's safety standards, visit:
http://www2.epa.gov/rodenticides/choosing-bait-station-household-use
Oil Spill
BP and Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries debate fishing areas
still closed from oil spill
Benjamin Alexander-Bloch
The Times-Picayune
May 30, 2014 at 4:06 PM
Following a Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries statement this
week labeling shrimp from areas still closed from the 2010 BP Deepwater
Horizon oil spill a "public health risk," BP took the offensive stating it
was "at a complete loss to understand the basis for LDWF's actions."
http://www.nola.com/environment/index.ssf/2014/05/bp_and_louisiana_department_of.html#incart_river
Louisiana lawmakers divide expected oil spill recovery funds
AP
BATON ROUGE — Louisiana lawmakers want to steer Gulf oil spill recovery
money to help refill the state's "rainy day" fund and an elderly trust fund
that was raided to fill budget holes.
http://www.shreveporttimes.com/viewart/20140531/NEWS01/305310034/Louisiana-lawmakers-divide-expected-oil-spill-recovery-funds
July 9 hearing set in BP employees' criminal case
AP
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A federal appeals court has set a July 9 hearing in the
manslaughter case against two BP employees charged in connection with the
2010 Deepwater Horizon explosion that killed 11 offshore rig workers.
http://www.sfgate.com/news/texas/article/July-9-hearing-set-in-BP-employees-criminal-case-5518588.php
State
Judge will not dismiss DEQ public records lawsuit
Clarion Ledger
The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality failed to
convince a judge that its wholesale redaction of invoices totaling
some $6 million didn't violate the state Public Records Act.
http://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/2014/05/30/judge-will-dismiss-deq-public-records-lawsuit/9799811/
Gulfport works to tackle illegal dumping problem
WLOX
GULFPORT, MS (WLOX) -If you live in Gulfport, you know that the city is
tackling illegal dumping by giving residents a more convenient way to get
rid of items they don't want. Keep Gulfport Clean and Green is a city wide
anti-litter campaign and part of the strategy to create a cleaner city by
temporarily placing dumpsters in residential neighborhoods.
http://www.wlox.com/story/25656178/gulfport-tries-to-tackle-illegal-dumping
Mississippi red snapper count begin Sunday night, forms available
Mississippi Press
May 31, 2014 at 7:57 AM
BILOXI, Mississippi -- The Mississippi Department of Marine Resources is
asking recreational fishermen to participate in a voluntary reporting
program for red snapper during the 2014 season.
http://blog.gulflive.com/mississippi-press-news/2014/05/mississippi_red_snapper_count.html
ANALYSIS: Despite officials acting in 'bad faith,' DMR records reach
newspaper
Sun Herald
BY ANITA LEE
More than 17 months after the Sun Herald requested business records from
what was then a scandal-ridden agency, the state Department of Marine
Resources, those records have finally reached the newspaper's office.
http://www.sunherald.com/2014/05/30/5614030/despite-officials-acting-in-bad.html?sp=/99/184/832/
Regional
Louisiana's regulation and inspection of oil and gas wells, including
'orphaned' wells, is inadequate, Legislative Auditor finds
Mark Schleifstein
The Times-Picayune
June 02, 2014 at 6:16 AM
The state Department of Natural Resources' Office of Conservation is doing
an inadequate job of regulating and inspecting the state's oil and gas
wells, and is not properly overseeing a growing number of "orphaned" wells
abandoned by private operators, according to a report released Monday by
Legislative Auditor Daryl Purpera.
http://www.nola.com/environment/index.ssf/2014/06/louisianas_regulation_and_insp.html#incart_river
National
EPA seeks to cut power plant carbon by 30 percent
BY DINA CAPPIELLO
Associated Press
June 2, 2014
WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Monday will roll out a
plan to cut carbon dioxide emissions from power plants by 30 percent by
2030, setting the first national limits on the chief gas linked to global
warming.
http://www.sunherald.com/2014/06/02/5617949/epa-seeks-to-cut-power-plant-carbon.html?sp=/99/102/
EPA to Seek 30% Cut in Emissions at Power Plants
Plan Sets in Motion Main Piece of President's Climate-Change Agenda
Wall Street Journal
WASHINGTON—The Environmental Protection Agency will propose mandating power
plants cut U.S. carbon-dioxide emissions 30% by 2030 from levels of 25
years earlier, according to people briefed on the rule, an ambitious target
that marks the first-ever attempt at limiting such pollution.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/epa-carbon-emissions-rules-carry-political-risks-for-some-democrats-1401658355
Q&A: What Will EPA's Climate-Change Rule Do?
Wall Street Journal
President Barack Obama is tackling climate change through regulation. With
a proposed rule being announced Monday, the Environmental Protection Agency
is using the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from
hundreds of power plants across the U.S. though complex proposal running
hundreds of pages. Here is a Q&A:
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/06/02/qa-what-will-epas-climate-change-rule-do/
States move to blunt Obama carbon reduction plan to be announced Monday
The Associated Press
June 01, 2014 at 8:07 PM
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) -- As President Barack Obama prepares to announce
tougher new air quality standards, lawmakers in several states already are
trying to blunt the impact on aging coal-fired power plants that feed
electricity to millions of consumers.
http://blog.gulflive.com/mississippi-press-news/2014/06/states_move_to_blunt_obama_car.html#incart_river
Trying to Reclaim Leadership on Climate Change
NY Times
By JUSTIN GILLIS and HENRY FOUNTAIN
JUNE 1, 2014
At the end of his first year in office, President Obama
flew to Copenhagen and made a big promise: that the United
States would cut its greenhouse gas emissions
substantially by 2020 — a bold and risky pledge that
hinged on a balky Congress to make it possible. His
efforts became bogged down within months, and Mr. Obama's
pledge to the rest of the world soon looked like a pipe
dream.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/02/us/politics/obama-tries-to-reclaim-leadership-on-climate-change.html?ref=earth&_r=0
Obama administration to announce controversial emissions cap on power
plants
Published June 02, 2014
FoxNews.com
The Obama administration on Monday is set to announce the first-ever
national limits on carbon emissions from existing power plants, a
controversial regulation aimed at fulfilling a key plank of President
Obama's climate change agenda.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/02/obama-to-announce-rule-to-limit-emissions-from-fossil-burning-plants-part-his/
Fracking wells possible culprit of Texas earthquakes
USA Today
RENO, Texas — The first time the earth shook their home, David and
Meredith Hull thought it was a propane tank exploding outside, an
odd but rare phenomenon.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/01/earthquakes-texas-fracking-wells/9765659/
White House Proposes Updated Great Lakes Plan
By JOHN FLESHER AP Environmental Writer
The Obama administration on Friday proposed an updated five-year blueprint
for Great Lakes environmental protection that would put greater emphasis on
climate change and using science to choose cleanup projects.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/administration-proposes-updated-great-lakes-plan-23929604
Press Releases
EPA Proposes First Guidelines to Cut Carbon Pollution from Existing Power
Plants
Clean Power Plan is flexible proposal to ensure a healthier environment,
spur innovation and strengthen the economy
WASHINGTON – At the direction of President Obama and after an unprecedented
outreach effort, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is today
releasing the Clean Power Plan proposal, which for the first time cuts
carbon pollution from existing power plants, the single largest source of
carbon pollution in the United States. Today's proposal will protect public
health, move the United States toward a cleaner environment and fight
climate change while supplying Americans with reliable and affordable
power.
"Climate change, fueled by carbon pollution, supercharges risks to our
health, our economy, and our way of life. EPA is delivering on a vital
piece of President Obama's Climate Action Plan by proposing a Clean Power
Plan that will cut harmful carbon pollution from our largest source--power
plants," said EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy. "By leveraging cleaner
energy sources and cutting energy waste, this plan will clean the air we
breathe while helping slow climate change so we can leave a safe and
healthy future for our kids. We don't have to choose between a healthy
economy and a healthy environment--our action will sharpen America's
competitive edge, spur innovation, and create jobs."
Power plants account for roughly one-third of all domestic greenhouse gas
emissions in the United States. While there are limits in place for the
level of arsenic, mercury, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particle
pollution that power plants can emit, there are currently no national
limits on carbon pollution levels.
With the Clean Power Plan, EPA is proposing guidelines that build on trends
already underway in states and the power sector to cut carbon pollution
from existing power plants, making them more efficient and less polluting.
This proposal follows through on the common-sense steps laid out in
President Obama's Climate Action Plan and the June 2013 Presidential
Memorandum.
By 2030, the steady and responsible steps EPA is taking will:
· Cut carbon emission from the power sector by 30 percent nationwide
below 2005 levels, which is equal to the emissions from powering more
than half the homes in the United States for one year;
· Cut particle pollution, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide by more
than 25 percent as a co-benefit;
· Avoid up to 6,600 premature deaths, up to 150,000 asthma attacks in
children, and up to 490,000 missed work or school days—providing up
to $93 billion in climate and public health benefits; and
· Shrink electricity bills roughly 8 percent by increasing energy
efficiency and reducing demand in the electricity system.
The Clean Power Plan will be implemented through a state-federal
partnership under which states identify a path forward using either current
or new electricity production and pollution control policies to meet the
goals of the proposed program. The proposal provides guidelines for states
to develop plans to meet state-specific goals to reduce carbon pollution
and gives them the flexibility to design a program that makes the most
sense for their unique situation. States can choose the right mix of
generation using diverse fuels, energy efficiency and demand-side
management to meet the goals and their own needs. It allows them to work
alone to develop individual plans or to work together with other states to
develop multi-state plans.
Also included in today's proposal is a flexible timeline for states to
follow for submitting plans to the agency—with plans due in June 2016, with
the option to use a two-step process for submitting final plans if more
time is needed. States that have already invested in energy efficiency
programs will be able to build on these programs during the compliance
period to help make progress toward meeting their goal.
Since last summer, EPA has directly engaged with state, tribal, and local
governments, industry and labor leaders, non-profits, and others. The data,
information and feedback provided during this effort helped guide the
development of the proposal and further confirmed that states have been
leading the way for years in saving families and businesses money through
improving efficiency, while cleaning up pollution from power plants. To
date, 47 states have utilities that run demand-side energy efficiency
programs, 38 have renewable portfolio standards or goals, and 10 have
market-based greenhouse gas emissions programs. Together, the agency
believes that these programs represent a proven, common-sense approach to
cutting carbon pollution—one in which electricity is generated and used as
efficiently as possible and which promotes a greater reliance on
lower-carbon power sources.
Today's announcement marks the beginning of the second phase of the
agency's outreach efforts. EPA will accept comment on the proposal for 120
days after publication in the Federal Register and will hold four public
hearings on the proposed Clean Power Plan during the week of July 28 in the
following cities: Denver, Atlanta, Washington, DC and Pittsburgh. Based on
this input, EPA will finalize standards next June following the schedule
laid out in the June 2013 Presidential Memorandum.
In 2009, EPA determined that greenhouse gas pollution threatens Americans'
health and welfare by leading to long lasting changes in our climate that
can have a range of negative effects on human health and the environment.
Taking steady, responsible steps to cut carbon pollution from existing
power plants will protect children's health and will move our nation toward
a cleaner, more stable environment for future generations, while supplying
the reliable, affordable power needed for economic growth.
Fact sheets and details about the proposed rule available at:
http://www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan
More information on President Obama's Climate Action Plan:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/climate-change
Video on today's announcement from Administrator Gina McCarthy:
http://www.epa.gov/
EPA and Reckitt Benckiser Inc. Reach Agreement to Cancel Certain
Rodenticide Products
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reached
agreement with Reckitt Benckiser Inc. to cancel 12 d-CON mouse and rat
poison products that do not currently comply with EPA safety standards.
"Millions of households use mouse and rat poison products each year.
Canceling these products will help prevent risks to children, pets and
wildlife," said Jim Jones, Assistant Administrator for EPA's Office of
Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. "This voluntary move will get us
far faster results than would otherwise be achieved through an
administrative process."
Before EPA tightened the safety standards for household rat and mouse
poison products, more than 10,000 children a year were accidentally
exposed. Since the new standard took effect, the number of children exposed
has decreased. The agency worked with a number of companies to develop
safer mouse and rat poison products that are effective, affordable and
widely available.
The cancellation of these 12 d-CON products that do not comply with current
standards will continue the trend of reduced exposure to children, pets and
wildlife. The company has agreed to stop production by the end of the year
and stop distribution to retailers by March 31, 2015. The new standards
require consumer mouse and rat poison products to be housed in protective
bait stations.
Pellets and other bait forms that cannot be secured in bait stations are
prohibited. EPA also prohibits the sale of products containing
brodifacoum, bromadiolone, difethialone and difenacoum to residential
consumers because of their greater risk to wildlife such as mountain lions,
eagles, wolves and foxes.
For more information, visit:
http://www2.epa.gov/rodenticides/canceling-some-d-con-mouse-and-rat-control-products
For a complete list of the homeowner use rat and mouse products that meet
EPA's safety standards, visit:
http://www2.epa.gov/rodenticides/choosing-bait-station-household-use
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)